<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My MVVM Framework : AKA Cinch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sachabarber.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sachabarber.net/?p=522</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sacha</title>
		<link>http://sachabarber.net/?p=522&#038;cpage=1#comment-4913</link>
		<dc:creator>sacha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sachabarber.net/?p=522#comment-4913</guid>
		<description>No you are correct as Int32 is not a DataWrapper&lt;T&gt; and doesnt inherit from ValidatingObject, you do have to do what you said, which is use this.AddRule()</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No you are correct as Int32 is not a DataWrapper<t> and doesnt inherit from ValidatingObject, you do have to do what you said, which is use this.AddRule()</t></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dieter Bocklandt</title>
		<link>http://sachabarber.net/?p=522&#038;cpage=1#comment-4912</link>
		<dc:creator>Dieter Bocklandt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sachabarber.net/?p=522#comment-4912</guid>
		<description>Hey Sasha,

For an assignment for school we had to use MVVM, so after evaluating some of the most popular frameworks, I&#039;ve decided to use your piece of art. Thanks to your extensive articles and well-commented source code, I had little trouble getting everything up and running. I do want to point out one thing that I believe is wrong in one of your articles (http://www.codeproject.com/KB/WPF/CinchII.aspx#validationRules). Here you give an example how to add rules to simple types, but a simple type like Int32 hasn&#039;t got a .AddRule method ofcourse, so instead of quantity.AddRule(..), I think it should be this.AddRule(...)

If I&#039;m mistaken, excuse me. 

Thanks for bringing out such full-featured framework,

Dieter

PS: Sorry for my english</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sasha,</p>
<p>For an assignment for school we had to use MVVM, so after evaluating some of the most popular frameworks, I&#8217;ve decided to use your piece of art. Thanks to your extensive articles and well-commented source code, I had little trouble getting everything up and running. I do want to point out one thing that I believe is wrong in one of your articles (<a href="http://www.codeproject.com/KB/WPF/CinchII.aspx#validationRules)" rel="nofollow">http://www.codeproject.com/KB/WPF/CinchII.aspx#validationRules)</a>. Here you give an example how to add rules to simple types, but a simple type like Int32 hasn&#8217;t got a .AddRule method ofcourse, so instead of quantity.AddRule(..), I think it should be this.AddRule(&#8230;)</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m mistaken, excuse me. </p>
<p>Thanks for bringing out such full-featured framework,</p>
<p>Dieter</p>
<p>PS: Sorry for my english</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XAMLCast – 2a Temporada – Episódio 7 – Silverlight Viewport, Visual Studio 2010 RC, MVVM - redeRIA &#124; Agregador de noticias, artigos, tutoriais Flex, Flash, JavaFX, AJAX e Rich internet applications em geral!</title>
		<link>http://sachabarber.net/?p=522&#038;cpage=1#comment-4902</link>
		<dc:creator>XAMLCast – 2a Temporada – Episódio 7 – Silverlight Viewport, Visual Studio 2010 RC, MVVM - redeRIA &#124; Agregador de noticias, artigos, tutoriais Flex, Flash, JavaFX, AJAX e Rich internet applications em geral!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sachabarber.net/?p=522#comment-4902</guid>
		<description>[...] http://sachabarber.net/?p=522 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://sachabarber.net/?p=522" rel="nofollow">http://sachabarber.net/?p=522</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola Carnevali</title>
		<link>http://sachabarber.net/?p=522&#038;cpage=1#comment-4057</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola Carnevali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sachabarber.net/?p=522#comment-4057</guid>
		<description>Sure, I&#039;ll send you something as soon as I have optimized the code.

Thanks,
Nicola</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, I&#8217;ll send you something as soon as I have optimized the code.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Nicola</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sacha</title>
		<link>http://sachabarber.net/?p=522&#038;cpage=1#comment-4056</link>
		<dc:creator>sacha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sachabarber.net/?p=522#comment-4056</guid>
		<description>Nicola

Great comments.

The Rules one, I think I may look into that. If you have some code / ideas Id love to see them. But I&#039;ll have a look when I have some time. That said the standard way to do validation is to have the rules hard coded into the Model using what Microsoft suggest with the IDataErrorInfo implementation. 

http://blogs.msdn.com/wpfsdk/archive/2007/10/02/data-validation-in-3-5.aspx

Which of course means we have the same problem. So from that point of view I do not feel too bad about my approach. But Ill look into it, or if you have something in mind send it my way, Id love to see it.

As far as ValidatingObject / INPC goes, yeah I think if people want an ObservableObject they can add there own its not so much work. As you say its down to personal taste.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicola</p>
<p>Great comments.</p>
<p>The Rules one, I think I may look into that. If you have some code / ideas Id love to see them. But I&#8217;ll have a look when I have some time. That said the standard way to do validation is to have the rules hard coded into the Model using what Microsoft suggest with the IDataErrorInfo implementation. </p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/wpfsdk/archive/2007/10/02/data-validation-in-3-5.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/wpfsdk/archive/2007/10/02/data-validation-in-3-5.aspx</a></p>
<p>Which of course means we have the same problem. So from that point of view I do not feel too bad about my approach. But Ill look into it, or if you have something in mind send it my way, Id love to see it.</p>
<p>As far as ValidatingObject / INPC goes, yeah I think if people want an ObservableObject they can add there own its not so much work. As you say its down to personal taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
